A GEO audit should identify specific obstacles to accurate, useful representation in generative search. Its output should be a prioritized set of changes, with evidence and an owner for each action.

The audit needs to cover both your website and the public information describing the business. It should also state which platforms were reviewed, because access rules and reporting differ.

Use this checklist to evaluate an existing site or assess the scope of a proposed GEO service.

Define the business and question scope

List the offers, customers, and locations that matter to the project. Then create a small question set covering discovery, comparisons, suitability, pricing, and process.

Separate branded questions from nonbranded ones. Include questions that customers actually ask, not only prompts designed to mention your company.

Document why each question matters and which page should help answer it.

If the audit cannot explain the commercial relevance of its question set, its visibility findings will be difficult to prioritize.

Review platform access deliberately

Identify the platforms in scope and check the relevant access requirements for public pages.

For Google, review search eligibility and the current Search generative AI control. For ChatGPT search, use the platform-specific access review.

Check whether robots rules, firewalls, login requirements, indexing directives, or rendering issues create obstacles. Record the actual page and observed behavior.

Do not issue a blanket instruction to allow all crawlers. The audit should distinguish business preferences from accidental restrictions.

Build an authoritative business fact sheet

Record the company name, current services, engagement models, contact details, eligible locations, and meaningful limitations.

Use this sheet to compare the homepage, service pages, about information, and important profiles.

Look for contradictions such as an old service that is still promoted, an outdated phone number, or a page promising implementation when the current offer is advisory.

The fact sheet should describe reality, not an aspirational version of the company. Assign an owner to keep it current.

Inspect the pages that should answer buying questions

For each priority question, review the intended destination. Can a visitor find the answer quickly? Does the page explain conditions that change it? Is the evidence appropriate?

Record vague statements that should become specific explanations. For example, “custom solutions” could be replaced with a description of how scope is determined and which choices the customer makes.

Also identify claims that need substantiation or removal. A polished sentence does not make an unsupported result reliable.

Our content writing guide for AI answers provides an editorial review method.

Review important external references

Prioritize sources that directly represent the business or help customers evaluate it. These may include professional profiles, partner listings, industry directories, and published references.

Check accuracy, relevance, and consistency. Avoid treating the total number of mentions as the main objective.

When a third-party description is wrong, document the available correction route and who will handle it. Some sources may be outside your control.

Keep unresolved items visible rather than implying the audit can correct every public reference.

Observe answers and cited destinations

Run the defined question set with a consistent method. Record the platform, date, settings, exact question, response, and sources.

Classify findings such as accurate mentions, incorrect descriptions, outdated sources, and relevant questions your site does not address.

Treat these as observations. A single missing mention does not prove a technical problem, and one favorable response does not establish persistent visibility.

Use our AEO measurement guide to maintain a repeatable log.

Check the path from discovery to inquiry

Open the pages that receive or could receive relevant traffic. Verify the answer, related links, mobile usability, and contact process.

Check whether the page leads naturally to the service being discussed. Confirm that a submitted inquiry reaches the right person and that the team records qualification.

This turns the audit from a visibility exercise into a review of the customer journey.

Produce a backlog the business can execute

FindingRecommended actionEvidence to retain
Inconsistent service descriptionsUpdate the authoritative pages and profilesBefore and after wording
Public page blocked unintentionallyReview the relevant access ruleAffected URL and live check
Buyer question poorly answeredImprove the existing pageQuestion, missing detail, revised answer
Wrong information in observed responseInvestigate cited sources and correct what is controllableDated response and source list
Useful page has no next stepAdd a relevant inquiry pathTested customer journey

Sector 13 can help prioritize and implement the findings from a GEO audit alongside your SEO work. Contact Josh with your site and the business questions you want the audit to address.